The term Brandologist didn’t come from a boardroom brainstorm or agency pitch deck.
I’ve always had a fixation on psychology. I studied it at uni 10 years ago, and I’ve been the person who naturally nerds out on how people think, decide, trust, judge, and buy. Even when I was working as a designer, psychology was the part I cared about more than the templates or deliverables.
But life has a way of creating rare moments of stillness.
After major surgery left me bed-bound for weeks, I finally had the space to look at my work without the noise of deadlines and client calendars. I was ready to show the depth that had always been there.
Between recovery naps and heat packs, I found myself returning to the things that had always lit me up:
• behavioural science
• cognitive bias
• perception and value
• why some brands earn trust instantly
• why others never break through
• how design changes behaviour
Everything I was already doing made more sense when I stopped pretending branding was just “design” and admitted what it actually was: applied psychology.
And that’s when the word landed.
Brandologist.
A name for the intersection I’d always lived in — strategy, psychology, and design.
It stuck.
And it became the language for the work I’d already been doing all along, just finally recognised for what it was.





